Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2011-03-10 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2011-03-10 House Journal Page 0429 HB 108 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the March 9, 2011, calendar (page 415), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 108(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government and for certain programs, capitalizing funds, amending appropriations, and making reappropriations; and providing for an effective date." **The presence of Representative Johansen was noted. Representative Petersen moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 108(FIN) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2011-03-10 House Journal Page 0430 The Speaker stated that, without objection, CSHB 108(FIN) would be returned to second reading for all amendments. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Petersen, Kawasaki, Gardner, Holmes, Gruenberg, Miller, and Tuck: Page 10, line 32: Delete "228,773,200" Insert "230,773,200" Delete "23,217,900" Insert "25,217,900" Page 11, line 12: Delete "8,781,700" Insert "10,781,700" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Petersen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative T. Wilson objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 108(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Cissna, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Holmes, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Miller, Petersen, Tuck Nays: Chenault, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gatto, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Johansen, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson 2011-03-10 House Journal Page 0431 Excused: Joule Absent: Seaton And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representatives Kawasaki, Gardner, Tuck, Petersen, Holmes, Miller, Gruenberg, and Guttenberg: Page 38, line 18: Delete "874,739,800" Insert "875,489,800" Delete "662,628,300" Insert "662,878,300" Delete "212,111,500" Insert "212,611,500" Page 39, line 7: Delete "243,916,900" Insert "244,666,900" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Fairclough objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 108(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Cissna, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Holmes, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Miller, Petersen, Tuck 2011-03-10 House Journal Page 0432 Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gatto, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Johansen, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Joule Absent: Seaton And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. **The presence of Representative Seaton was noted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representatives Gardner, Kawasaki, Miller, Holmes, Tuck, Petersen, Cissna, Gruenberg, and Guttenberg: Page 38, line 18: Delete "874,739,800" Insert "876,783,400" Delete "662,628,300" Insert "663,904,300" Delete "212,111,500" Insert "212,879,100" Page 38, line 26: Delete "249,332,800" Insert "250,176,500" Page 39, line 7: Delete "243,916,900" Insert "245,116,800" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Gardner moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Fairclough objected. 2011-03-10 House Journal Page 0433 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 108(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Cissna, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Holmes, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Miller, Petersen, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gatto, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Johansen, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Joule And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representatives Gruenberg, Kawasaki, Miller, Tuck, Gardner, Petersen, Holmes, and Cissna: Page 11, line 31: Delete "26,019,600" Insert "27,119,600" Delete "13,954,800" Insert "15,054,800" Page 11, line 33: Delete "15,054,800" Insert "16,154,800" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Gruenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative T. Wilson objected. 2011-03-10 House Journal Page 0434 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 108(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Cissna, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Holmes, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Miller, Petersen, Thomas, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gatto, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Johansen, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Joule And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. CSHB 108(FIN) was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall CSHB 108(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 108(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 36 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Cissna, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Johansen, Johnson, Keller, Kerttula, Lynn, Miller, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Nays: Holmes, Kawasaki, Petersen Excused: Joule And so, CSHB 108(FIN) passed the House. 2011-03-10 House Journal Page 0435 Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 108(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.